Attention Herbert Xu: FWD: failure notice
Your mail is bouncing.
----- Forwarded message from MAILER-DAEMON@kitenet.net -----
Date: 27 Sep 1999 23:14:48 -0000
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at kitenet.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
Connected to 126.96.36.199 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 Access denied
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Received: (qmail 19669 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 1999 23:14:43 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 16:14:43 -0700
From: Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Herbert Xu <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: a question about BTS severities
Message-ID: <[🔎] 19990927161443.B19361@kitenet.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Herbert Xu <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
References: <[🔎] 19990927093339.G18583@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 199909272244.IAA06421@gondor.apana.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 199909272244.IAA06421@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Joey Hess <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Similarly, I don't think a bug is grave if it makes a package unusable by
> > just one person in an odd sitution. On the other hand, I think all security
> > and data loss bugs are grave, even if only a few people can trigger them.
> I disagree. If a package causes a remote root exploit to be available, even
> if it's only in a very specific configuration, I would say that it is critical.
No, it's grave. All security bugs are grave, it's part of the definition of
that priority. And later in my message, I said:
Similarly, I don't think a bug is grave if it makes a package unusable by
just one person in an odd sitution. On the other hand, I think all security
and data loss bugs are grave, even if only a few people can trigger them.
see shy jo
----- End forwarded message -----
see shy jo