Re: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?

To: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?
From: "Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 21:07:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990926210722.B4458@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990926165626.A645@in.tum.de>
References: <[🔎] 19990926165626.A645@in.tum.de>

On Sep 26, Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de> wrote:
 >I just noticed that the BTS lists 2 outstanding important bugs
 >(#40360,#40459) against mutt, although they have been closed by mutt_0.95.7-1:
They have been reopened, the bug is not fixed.

If someone understands automake please help.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- [FIXED] Re: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?
  - From: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>

References:
- Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?
  - From: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>

Prev by Date: Intent to Package: gtkpool
Next by Date: Re: Conference! - around the world with Debian
Previous by thread: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?
Next by thread: [FIXED] Re: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread