David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu>: > Instead of each developer chose what packages are and aren't useful > to them, why don't we look at the popularity contest? A simple, bias-free > way of seperating programs on to the CD's, by actual use. That is what > it was made for. http://www.debian.org/~apenwarr/popcon/ says *** THIS IS EXPERIMENTAL!! *** Try not to get upset if the results are incorrect, but be sure to e-mail me if you think there's something funny going on. I wouldn't base decisions on it yet. However, I don't, personally, much care how packages are divided among CD's, as long as the first one contains everything of priority Standard and above, including everything they depend on, and most of what they recommend, so that it is easy to get a basic system running without switching CD's all the time. As long as the rest of the packages are on the CD's, it shouldn't matter much. -- Stupid little mailer under construction, sorry for any problems.
Attachment:
pgpfVBMYIlNNo.pgp
Description: PGP signature