Re: speeding up the release cycle (was Re: Debian's problems)
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Monday, September 13, 1999, 8:56:21 AM, Peter wrote:
> >> gs?
>
> > Yeah. I bet we would not remove gs from a release if it had
> > release-critical bugs (we'd have to fix them). It's too
> > important of an optional package.
>
> Ya know, I put the question mark there for a reason. As in... [What is]
> gs? Can't be so important then, now can it?
Oh, sorry.
gs is ghostscript. I consider a postscript interpreter pretty
important. It's what I use to preview plots on-screen and what I
use to print them, as well as LaTeX, to non-postscript printers.
Debian would be seriously broken without it IMHO.
Reply to: