[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shlibs files and libfoo.so



On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 08:10:07PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > And I have yet to hear a better idea to solve the problem.  I have said I
> > would withdraw my proposal if I heard another reasonable idea.  Simply not
> > using dpkg-shlibdeps isn't IMO reasonable, neither is hacking a binary.
> 
> Agreed, can we please just push this through?

Is that a second?  =>

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"my biggest problem with RH (and especially RH contrib packages) is that
they DON'T have anything like our policy.  That's one of the main reasons
why their packages are so crappy and broken.  Debian has the teamwork
side of building a distribution down to a fine art."

Attachment: pgpd17Vxjl41O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: