[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shlibs files and libfoo.so

On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 12:25:09PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> Other packages for similar reasons are built without dpkg-shlibdeps.  I
> decided to fix this bug.  And now my bugfix is being stonewalled for
> political reasons.  If those who oppose policy ammendments aren't willing
> to stand behind their opposition, they should not be allowed to kill off
> those ammendments by simply dropping out of the conversation and saying
> nothing more.
> And I have yet to hear a better idea to solve the problem.  I have said I
> would withdraw my proposal if I heard another reasonable idea.  Simply not
> using dpkg-shlibdeps isn't IMO reasonable, neither is hacking a binary.

Agreed, can we please just push this through?

Zephaniah E. Hull..
> -- 
> Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
> GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
> PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * dark has changed the topic on channel #debian to: Later tonight: After
>   months of careful refrigeration, Debian 2.0 is finally cool enough to
>   release.

 PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <warp@whitestar.soark.net>-GPG E65A7801
    Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys.
           CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.

Attachment: pgpaFCCvUsKjS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: