Re: security.debian.org mirrors?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: security.debian.org mirrors?
- From: Guy Maor <email@example.com>
- Date: 02 Sep 1999 22:18:14 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: Wichert Akkerman's message of "Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:10:34 +0200"
- References: <19990830175302.B12050@efis.ucr.ac.cr> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990830180034.11238B-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com> <19990830181047.C12050@efis.ucr.ac.cr> <email@example.com> <19990831141034.B8841@mors.net>
Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The reasoning is that proposed-updated contains a lot of packages, some
> of which might be broken (no check on uploading & installing). And we
> don't want to encourage people to automatically upgrade to those, but we
> do want to be able to allow people to automatically upgrade only
That's silly. Why not apply the labor that goes into keeping
security.debian.org up-to-date and put it toward keeping stable up to
date? Every time you want to put a package on security.debian.org,
instead install it to stable and make a point-release.
I was under the impression that security.debian.org was a permament
place for security updates so that URLs would always be correct. If
that's not so, I don't see the point of the security site.