[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Requests from one Japanese User.

From: Vincent Renardias <vincent@ldsol.com>
Subject: Re: Requests from one Japanese User.
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 09:34:38 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.02.9909020933320.445-100000@v2.ldsol.com>

vincent> Is it really usefull to have 2 binary packages? Can't the version with
vincent> Kanji enabled handle Latin1 also?
vincent> Just wondering...

  I'm not sure, sorry. But I heard that Kanji-supoprt and
Greek-support can not be consistent in same binary, while Kanji and
Latin1 can.

  If I remember correctly, it is a reason why rxvt-ml has more than
one binaries (krxvt, rxvt-big5, crxvt-gb, grxvt, crxvt).  aterm and
eterm are based on rxvt, same reason can be applied.

  Anyone who knows about that correctly, please comment.


Research Institute of Electrical Communication
Tohoku University
Dr. Ryuichi Arafune

Reply to: