Re: usr/man vs usr/share/man?
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Raul> [Earlier today I posted saying I didn't think this was a problem.]
Raul> [I was wrong.]
Raul> On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Is this not just an issue of swetting MANPATH defaults?
Raul> There's still a problem here: If someone upgrades a slink system
Raul> without installing all of potato (perhaps using apt-get install), and
Raul> the installed packages supply /usr/share/man man pages and it doesn't
Raul> have a dependency on some fhs capable version of man-db then yes:
Raul> there's a problem.
You are talking about partial upgrades from slink to
potato. For this, we can ask people to upgrade first to proposed
upgrades, which contain a fixed man-db package, or to edit
We do want to make partial upgrades smooth, but it is not
unreasonable to ask people to upgrade to proposed-updates before
doing paertial upgrades.
Audience: What will become of Linux when the Hurd is ready? Eric
Youngdale: Err... is Richard Stallman here? From the Linux conference
in spring '95, Berlin
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E