Re: Japanized packages (was: Re: new LaTeX2e)

[Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>]

From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Japanized packages (was: Re: new LaTeX2e)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 01:34:09 +0100 (BST)

> > Yes you are right, I know that. I think that the diversion
> > will be safer way to recover original state, that is
> > if you remove my package it will safely recover the original
> > tetex environment again.
> 
> No: in the postrm, do:
> 
> if command -v texconfig 2>/dev/null 1>&2; then texconfig init; fi
> 
> This will rebuild the necessary format files on the fly.  How do you

Sorry I did not express myself well but I wanted to say that I
compared this and the diversion and I chose the diversion only 
temporarily.

But as you pointed out the above is tetex's method so I will 
try and check its behaviour later.

>                                                           How do you
> know that the tetex package hasn't been upgraded in the meantime?

Hmm, very sorry but I can not understand this sentence well.
You want to say I do not understand the reason why the tetex 
package hasn't been upgraded or something else ?

Thanks in advance,		1999.8.30