Re: RfD: Preparing Debian 2.1r3

[Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>]

Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Thu 19 Aug 1999, Martin Schulze wrote:
> 
> > 2. Packages removed from proposed-updates
> > -----------------------------------------
> > 
> >   package: fvwm2
> >   version: 2.0.46-BETA-3.1
> >     some alpha update, but I'm not convinced we need to include it. We
> >     should probably check with some alpha people for this one
> 
> Do you mean `alpha' as in the processor? AFAIK I was running the
> standard slink fvwm2 package up to a couple of weeks ago when I upgraded
> to potato, and never noticed anything (especially :-) strange. So, I
> doubt whether any update is necessary.

Probably not:

-rw-rw-r--   1 maor     debadmin   281062 Jul 27 13:53 fvwm-common_2.0.46-BETA-3.1_m68k.deb
-rw-rw-r--   1 maor     debadmin     1107 Jul 27 13:53 fvwm2_2.0.46-BETA-3.1_m68k.changes
-rw-rw-r--   1 maor     debadmin   362454 Jul 27 13:53 fvwm2_2.0.46-BETA-3.1_m68k.deb

Changes:
 fvwm2 (2.0.46-BETA-3.1) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Corrected Fvwm.tmpl to look for AlphaArchitecture && __linux__
     instead of just linux.  This seems to work again.

Hmm, maybe yes?  I'm not convinced anyway, I guess it should
read "unstable" instead of "frozen unstable" and was only a late
compilation.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
The only stupid question is the unasked one.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.