Re: Coda (experimental) has naming conflicts with cfs
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 23:19:31 +1000, Chris Leishman wrote:
> What is the best way to solve this? (remembering that cfs is a "currently in
> use" package,
But how widely is it used? IIRC, it is orphaned upstream, and
TCFS (http://tcfs.dia.unisa.it/) is considered a better alternative.
> and coda is in experimental - although coda may be more widely used in
> future...)
I certainly expect it to be.
I'd prefer it if cfs' binary were renamed. If you suspect it may have been
used by local admins in a script, consider adding a warning in the postinst
(on first upgrade to a version with the new name only).
HTH,
Ray
--
J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may
jdassen@wi.LeidenUniv.nl | not be a better one than the one the blocks
| live in but it'll be a sight more vivid.
| - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Reply to: