Torsten Landschoff <t.landschoff@gmx.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 03:06:47PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > > Hmm, it may be better to remove all 2.0.x kernels. We'll base potato > > on 2.2 after all. > > I would formal object against this ;) Seriously, I have had a lot of problems > with 2.2.x and I think as long as the 2.0 series works correctly we should > provide it as a safe fall back. I have some odd hardware that works better in 2.0.x than 2.2.x, so I put forth another vote that we keep a kernel-* 2.0.38 in Potato, just have 2.2.x as the default kernel. -- I consume, therefore I am
Attachment:
pgpPnc9Edka8A.pgp
Description: PGP signature