[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ash vs. bash



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 18:28:46 +0200, Carlo Strozzi wrote:

>Oh, not at all, I didn't mean that. I definitely think most people
>(including myself) would like to stick to bash for interactive use;
>it should continue to be required, or at least important.

    But if bash is no longer /bin/sh why keep it important or recommended at
all when there are other interactive shells out there?  tcsh, zsh both come
to mind.

- -- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQA/AwUBN5NvkHpf7K2LbpnFEQKXEwCfaxcw+vLD9c3WbjnIirDFpommYqgAnirZ
nSUsSetFMaXHzbbg4Bg9jHdX
=4XFf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: