Re: ITP: mhash

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITP: mhash
From: "J.H.M. Dassen" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 21:04:26 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990707210426.I844@pc203a.wi.leidenuniv.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.A32.3.96.990707143716.25791O-100000@caesar.power.elte.hu>; from Gergely Madarasz on Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 02:42:13PM +0200
References: <[🔎] Pine.A32.3.96.990707143716.25791O-100000@caesar.power.elte.hu>

On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 14:42:13 +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> Is this suitable for main ?

I think so. Secure hashes aren't supposed to trigger crypto export
regulations, and I'm not aware of patents causing problems for hash
functions.

Ray
-- 
Cyberspace, a final frontier. These are the voyages of my messages, 
on a lightspeed mission to explore strange new systems and to boldly go
where no data has gone before.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ITP: mhash
  - From: "Ralf W. Stephan" <Ralf_W.Stephan@t-online.de>

References:
- ITP: mhash
  - From: Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@caesar.elte.hu>

Prev by Date: policy regarding binary-only packages?
Next by Date: Contact needed -- Sun Microsystems
Previous by thread: ITP: mhash
Next by thread: Re: ITP: mhash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread