[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mutt-i vs mutt

On Jul 01, John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu> wrote:
 >  This problem nailed me once too.  There were some docs somewhere
 >that still refered to the previous state of afairs.  Maybe mutt-i
 >should be removed, or upgraded to include a warning message.	
I asked many times the non-us FTP maintainer to remove it.
If it's still there please complain to him.

Marco (mutt maintainer)

Reply to: