Re: mutt-i vs mutt
*Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Jul 01, John Travers wrote:
> > Hi, I have just installed mutt in the UK as the mutt-i version is broken at
> > the moment, however I have (pleasantly) discovered that I have full use of pgp
> > from within this version, so what is different with mutt-i?
> mutt-i is obsolete and has been for some time; all of its
> functionality is in the mainstream mutt package.
This problem nailed me once too. There were some docs somewhere
that still refered to the previous state of afairs. Maybe mutt-i
should be removed, or upgraded to include a warning message.
AAMOF, I recall that two or three mirrors had a corrupted binary.
It shouldn't even be there at all.
John Lapeyre <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com