Re: Postfix as default MTA?
Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes:
> it's got a "plain english" config file, well documented with comments
> and examples. the defaults work fine for simple installs. changing the
> configuration is mostly a matter of uncommenting or making minor changes
> to sample lines in the main.cf file.
Yes, but I'm curious what its *advantages* are over exim, not all the
ways in which it's the same. :-)
(Perhaps all that anti-spam stuff is the answer I was looking for.
And in any case, I'm still *not* objecting to the proposal, just
looking for info -- and replies can still come directly to me, rather
than to the list....)
I do think (as others have commented) that we should wait until more
testing has been done before switching defaults (again), but if we
don't find any flaws during the burn-in period, than I'll be more than
happy to switch, if that's what people want.
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: