Re: split packages
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 09:30:43AM -0400, email@example.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 09:13:38AM -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > > But I figure the extra packages are going to be hassle for porters.
> > > > It seems likely that all three will be released together upstream.
> > > > Building gschem will need libgeda2, libgeda-dev and geda-symbols installed.
> > > > This looks like trouble for porters/autobuild daemons.
> > >
> > > Why can't you set it so that it builds the libs, then compiles the gschem w/
> > > -L/path/to/my/new/libs and -I/path/to/my/new/headers??
> > Because then you have to have more than one source package unpacked at
> > once, which the build daemons can do, but it's not the prefered way.
> Did I misunderstand you Homish? All three items will be in one source, but one
> of the items must be compiled after the other two is how I read it.
Upstream is providing them as three separate sources -- that's the problem,
since built versions of geda-symbols and libgeda2 will be needed to
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD).
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.