Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 10:13:55 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990530101355.D843@wonderland.linux.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990529204236.A8217@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>; from Thomas Quinot on Sat, May 29, 1999 at 08:42:36PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 19990529204236.A8217@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>

On May 29, Thomas Quinot <thomas@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG> wrote:
 >Why not manage /bin/sh using alternatives? This would seem very natural.
An hosed system could lose /etc.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

References:
- Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
  - From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG>

Prev by Date: Re: ITP: stalin - it's now GPLed.
Next by Date: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
Previous by thread: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
Next by thread: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread