Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
- To: email@example.com (Joel Klecker)
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport)
- From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 02:55:18 +0100 (BST)
- Message-id: <E10nuop-0000Be-00@polya>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com> from Joel Klecker at "May 29, 1999 4: 5:50 pm"
> ash is not POSIX compliant, incidentally. Basically there are two
> POSIX shells in Debian, bash and pdksh.
But as far as I can determine from the ash manpage, it is heading that
way (this is from the slink version):
Sh is the standard command interpreter for the system.
The current version of sh is in the process of being
changed to conform with the POSIX 1003.2 and 1003.2a spec-
ifications for the shell. This version has many features
which make it appear similar in some respects to the Korn
shell, but it is not a Korn shell clone (run GNU's bash if
you want that). Only features designated by POSIX, plus a
few Berkeley extensions, are being incorporated into this
shell. We expect POSIX conformance by the time 4.4 BSD is
released. This man page is not intended to be a tutorial
or a complete specification of the shell.
So do you mean that it is not yet POSIX compliant? And if so, then
the bash manpage also says:
Bash is ultimately intended to be a conformant implementa-
tion of the IEEE POSIX Shell and Tools specification (IEEE
Working Group 1003.2).
And even then, bash still seems to require the --posix command-line
option to behave in a truly POSIX-compliant way.
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer. firstname.lastname@example.org
-*- Finger email@example.com for my PGP public key. -*-