build cluster for all architectures.
what you propose here, sounds very reasonable to me.
For most dialup developers, it will be very inconvinient to work on
this cluster. So writing the fail logs in the home directory will be
of little use.
[copied with permission from debian-private --- no cc to private
because it will be easy to accidentially leak confidential mail. ]
Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
[lot's of packages fail when a build daemon for other architecture
tries to build them]
> I agree, right now sparc lists over 100 failed builds that aren't sparc related.
> Some are trivial, some out right stupidity (no rule for binary-arch in
> debian/rules) and some will probably never get fixed without rewrites.
> A lot of maintainers are very good about patching for other archs, and even
> supply the patch upstream. Other maintainers completely ignore (or are MIA) the
> patches supplied in the BTS.
> Which leads me to a suggestion I've been mulling over for awhile (yes this
> get's off topic and is probably best suited for -devel, so Cc there if that's
> your feeling). Will we ever be able to setup a build cluster? I mean let the
> packagers test build their software on whatever primary arch they want to,
> then upload the source (once they feel it is able to compile correctly) to
> a build cluster that then tries to compile it on every arch that it claims
> to support (in the Arch field). If it does not compile on any of them the
> fail logs and source are left in the users homedir (shared between all the
> build systems) so that they can test and fix the problems. After it compiles
> on all of them, the multi-arch .changes is sent to the maintainer for signing
> and then sent to Incoming for dinstall.
> This fixes several problems, 1) packages that are uploaded that _do not_
> compile from the source (believe me, there are more of these than you think,
> even ones that make use of scripts not in the source or in any packages), 2)
> it keeps the archs in sync. Since right now all of the stable archs are pretty
> much in sync with the compiler/kernel/libc (excepting m68k), this approach
> is starting to be more feasible and needed. Also we end up with a more secure
> archive since all packages will be built by one system and only the source
> needs to be verified (signed on upload to the build system).
> I'm willing to setup a few systems and even get the bandwidth donated if need
> be. This could be setup as a voluntary system for initial testing, and I'm sure
> the wanna-build people would be very interested in helping with something like
P.S.: Please vote against Spam! At
(Sorry Europeans only)
Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter
Key fingerprint: 5F 3D 43 1E 24 1E CC 48 1E 05 93 3A A7 10 73 37