From: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it> > From the user perspective the proposed solution is not different from the > current installation method. The only difference is that it would use a > dialog interface by default, if available, but this can be easily disabled > by the user, making the question appearance identical to the current one. That's one reason I like the general direction - it isn't worse than the current situation, and has a chance to help improve the process later on. > I agree with you that many pop-ups could be annoying to the user but this is > a limitation of the various dialog programs. We need an user interface which > could display forms with many fields but at the moment I haven't found one I don't have a personal experience with actually writing this, but even the kernel's config scripts seem to be a possible start. Don't you think? From looking at the config language (/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/config.in) it looks like it is scriptable, but all the conditions and actions there seem to be easely expressable in some static form. > and can't ever write it. Consider also that often a question is conditioned > by a previous answer, so it must be serialized. I though about this too. That's why I directed my questions to the chap who did the "survey" of the current situation - if the relations between conditional questions can be expressed in a form of a data (then we can avoid the need to express the conditions in a script form. Avoiding this will allow several tools to be applied to the same conditions and react differently to them (command-line vs. full-screen text vs. X11-GUI, for instance) > We could group questions inside a begin-end block that, when a form-capable > dialog will be available, would present all the questions in one single > form, but this is beyond the scope of my proposal. If we decide that this > is important we could provide dummy begin/end commands which will be > implemented later. Right. At least it won't hurt the current tools and may help in automatic transition when better tools are available. Cheers, --Amos --Amos Shapira | "Of course Australia was marked for | glory, for its people had been chosen amos@gezernet.co.il | by the finest judges in England." | -- Anonymous
Attachment:
pgpXixNriX4rf.pgp
Description: PGP signature