* Marcus Brinkmann said: > > dpkg is already far too slow on old hardware...hell, it's too slow on > > a P200 with 200MB of RAM, now that the status and available files have > > over 3300 packages detailed in them. > > Yeah, it's slow, and it's written in C. Linux is slow. It's written in C. Yeah... > And you want to cinvince me by your un-emotional argumentation that it will > be even slower in C++? [snip] > ignoring things like maintenability and development of code looks > simple-minded to me. The difference in speed will be unnoticable if the same > algorithms are used. Now you've proven it. You're a fanatic. And you offend people. Thanks. marek
Attachment:
pgpvu9Avk56sa.pgp
Description: PGP signature