Re: Putting distributed-net back up for adoption
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 05:41:01PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Klein wrote:
> > number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird
> > behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move).
>
> Really? That's odd since it is a statically linked binary. I don't see how
> libc could affect it.
hmm...that's right...I wonder what caused the problem, then. (the problem
is that distributed-net forks an extra process, and kills the original,
thus making the pid file unusable)
--
a jolly daemon kin
Reply to: