Re: Bugs graph

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>, Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bugs graph
From: Sven LUTHER <luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 16:35:28 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990505163528.X17947@maxime.u-strasbg.fr>
Reply-to: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E10f2WF-0007OJ-00@polya>; from Julian Gilbey on Wed, May 05, 1999 at 03:19:27PM +0100
References: <[🔎] E10f2WF-0007OJ-00@polya>

On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 03:19:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I just had a peep at the bugs graph: it appears that we have about
> 1000 more non-wishlist bugs than we did before slink's release.  What
> can we do about this, or is this fairly normal and expected?

is it because prior to slink release, all the potato specific bugs where hold from
the graph ? Or is this graph stuff not that sophisticated ?

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bugs graph
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Bugs graph
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bugs graph
Next by Date: Re: Bugs graph
Previous by thread: Bugs graph
Next by thread: Re: Bugs graph
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread