Re: Intent to package mod_ssl
In article <cistron.19990426213448.A11014@hq.yok.utu.fi>,
Tommi Virtanen <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 07:31:22PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>> Well it's not really an intent to package, I have already packaged it
>> and I'm ready to upload libapache-mod-ssl_2.2.8-1.3.6-1
> Then we did overlapping work. Bad things happen.
Oh bummer. Another day wasted :/
> Please get my package from
>deb http://pandora.debian.org/%7Etv/ deb/
> and compare
Yes, your package is a bit more polished as there is a 400mod_ssl.info
file included (mine didn't do that). Also the "long description" is
better then mine.
Ah, I see you made a separate doc package. Not a bad idea.
The things my package has as an extra:
- Included sample configuration
- Included a mod-ssl-makecert script to create and handle certificates
- README.Debian describing in detail how to configure the module
> My package is finished, the possible things missing
> are autogeneration of keys and Apache configs, etc..
Aha, that is precisely what my package does have.
> it's fine with me if you merge them
> and function as the maintainer of the package.
Same goes for me, actually :) ...
I've merged the 2 packages, the result is at
Want to take a look at it?
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?