Re: Logo procedure and ideas
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, James A. Treacy wrote:
> This is getting very tiresome. Every time this has come up, these points
> have been stated up front. And repeated. Many times.
>
> Yes, it would have been nice to have more submissions during the previous
> contest. But why is it that people lambaste the previous submissions,
> repeat the original criteria and submit new entries AFTER the deadline
> for the previous contest?
>
I agree. It's been well over a year fooling with the logo. At least two of
the logos up for vote now are perfectly good. Pick one, move on.
Havoc
Reply to: