On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 09:51:01AM -0400, Mike Goldman wrote: > Not the point. Does the mark belong to OSI? Or does it belong to SPI? > If we > don't defend the mark, but OSI does, then I guess the mark is theirs, > and we've > conceded it. Thus, i.e. APSL is Open Source, because OSI says so. That's a lot of FUD. Why can't people do a little research, first? SPI appointed ESR to manage the mark... In the beginning, it looked like he was going to do the write thing. OSI doesn't have to *own* the mark, just permission to manage. The issue is, should management be pulled from OSI or not. SPI needs to address HOW the mark is being managed.. not the FACT that OSI is doing it. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > > -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpmKvbAy2jz1.pgp
Description: PGP signature