Re: new list and personal fights on debian
>From bruce Tue Apr 6 04:23:55 1999
Received: (qmail 6611 invoked from network); 6 Apr 1999 11:23:54 -0000
Received: from geneva.visi.net (HELO mail4.visi.net) (188.8.131.52)
by perens.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 1999 11:23:54 -0000
Received: from goodguy.visi.net (firstname.lastname@example.org.NewportNews.visi.net [184.108.40.206]) by mail4.visi.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA22674; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 07:32:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by visi.net
via sendmail from stdin
id <m10UTxg-000qkRC@goodguy.visi.net> (Debian Smail220.127.116.11)
for email@example.com; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 07:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 07:24:08 -0400
From: Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> No one should feel afraid to post in rebuttal against the leaders of this
> community. If we can't doubt their reasons, or question their motives, then
> they are not the leaders that we need.
> However, some feel that you are trying to feed off of the public lists
> and opinions just to get affirmation on what you believe.
Not affirmation, Consensus! What could be more important? How could anyone
familiar with our process have missed that? And yes, I feel I'm getting a
consensus on some of these issues. Should I feel bad about asking for one?
Maybe you could clear this up for me.
> Maybe in the future it would be wise to refrain from directing public
> statements toward specific people.