Re: Mostly free software...
- To: David Welton <davidw@master.debian.org>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Mostly free software...
- From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
- Date: 01 Apr 1999 23:35:07 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 871zi3bhlg.fsf@wsfs05.mckesson.com>
- In-reply-to: David Welton's message of "Wed, 31 Mar 1999 12:52:58 -0600"
- References: <19990325211554.S10238@debian.org> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9903252232500.17008-100000@zirx.pair.com> <19990325223559.A6080@debian.org> <19990330115912.E9097@worldvisions.ca> <19990330125229.C19653@debian.org> <37018DA4.7BBCFD56@luci.org> <19990331125258.B7816@debian.org>
>>>>> "David" == David Welton <davidw@master.debian.org> writes:
David> On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 08:51:16PM -0600, Jeff Licquia
David> wrote:
>> Finally, there's the bragging rights: "My software is so good,
>> even my competitors rely on it."
David> That's a pretty good argument, in some situations. It says
David> that you are the best in the field, and that's a pretty
David> good reason for clients to deal with you.
Actually, I think the opposite is more true. I know far too many
vendors who insist on reinventing the wheel to avoid using other
vendors' products and the inevitable meadia circus that would ensue.
--
Stephen
---
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. - Bruce Schneier
Reply to: