Re: MTA wars (was Re: make anacron a base package)
On Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:21:42 +1000, you wrote:
> exim,
>well, isn't. It's maintained, it's considered secure, it's considered
>fairly fast (although usually qmail is nominated as better), and it's
>considered easy to configure and well documented. At least by me.
I second this. qmail is known to perform better under load because it
doesn't fork (and I actually like it because of the maildir concept -
no locks!), but exim is still easier to configure. And exim's support
is superb. One time, it took Philip a mere 38 minutes to produce a
(working!) fix for an obscure bug that I have been experiencing.
_This_ is what I call supported software.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Reply to: