Re: Mixed Packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Mixed Packages
From: Petr Cech <cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:21:13 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990330182113.A16826@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990330103720.19151A-100000@acm.njit.edu>; from John Rizzo on Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 10:40:36AM -0500
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990330103720.19151A-100000@acm.njit.edu>

On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 10:40:36AM -0500 , John Rizzo wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why this always comes up with slink..
> 
> libnet-perl recommends libnet-telnet-perl
> libnet-telnet-perl does not appear to be available
No, it doesn't. Slink version is 1.605-1 and it has no Recommends:

However version 1.606-1 in potato recommends libnet-telnet-perl.

				Petr Cech 
--
 /    mailto: cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz    \
|   PGP: finger cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz	|
 \      C75B671E75117038  43BE6B9AC09C3318     /

Reply to:

References:
- Mixed Packages
  - From: John Rizzo <follower@acm.njit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Intent to package... but do you really want to know?
Next by Date: [Fredrik Noring <noring@idonex.se>] Re: Roxen Challenger i Debian
Previous by thread: Mixed Packages
Next by thread: Re: Mixed Packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread