[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME universe



On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote:

> Montreal Mon Mar 15 15:29:26 1999
> 
> Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com> wrote:
> > Still, Gnome is pretty bad at poluting the namespace.  It could do a
> > lot better.
> 
> Wouldn't you say the packager is ultimately responsible for handling
> this sort of thing?  I mean, just because the official GNOME rpms do
> this, doesn't mean the GNOME debs have to do it too.
> 
> For example, no other application in Debian that I know of uses
> /usr/etc/.  It's not even defined in the FHS.  Yet it seems that
> because the GNOME rpms use it, the GNOME debs use it too...  I thought 
> Debian was strict about that kind of thing.
> 
> FYI:
> 
> [asimov] [/usr/etc] ls -al
> total 3
> drwxr-xr-x   3 root     root         1024 Mar  6 00:14 .
> drwxr-xr-x  19 root     root         1024 Mar  5 23:37 ..
> drwxr-xr-x   3 root     root         1024 Mar  5 23:37 CORBA
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           16 Mar  6 00:13 mc.global -> etc/mc/mc.global 
> 
> Maybe I'm at fault for stealing debs from Jules personal homepage
> though...  :)

Doh.

That's a bug (as someone else observed).

FWIW, /usr/local/etc makes some sense, and I can see why people use it.
Therefore, when you ./configure --prefix=/usr you have to remember to
--sysconfdir=/etc.

Any further reports along these lines to
debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, please.

Jules

/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd	       |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/


Reply to: