[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intend to package mountapp



Argggh!  -- this after (iirc) I was told otherwise?   :(

let me check just to be sure.

hrmm -- no -- mine was a bit different -- nevermind :)


On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 07:20:08PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Olaf Stetzer wrote:
> > BTW: I remember a discussion about the correct naming of the binaries
> > and debian-package for docking apps. What is the correct way? Naming it
> > by the tarball name - in this case mountapp - or by the binary which would
> > be mount.app IIRC? 
> 
> Please name it like the tarball: mountapp.  This might be a special
> situation where it might be useful to name it wm-mountapp or windowmaker-mountapp
> because it's only useful for windowmaker.  Please exchange with the
> windowmaker maintainer and maintainers of other wm- apps if there
> are any.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Joey
> 
> -- 
> The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media.  -- H. Peter Anvin
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

Attachment: pgpZIa7_zNrDp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: