Re: non-us

[Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>]

In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.05.9903120305190.3828-100000@tao.ca> you write:
>It would seem that we should have a non-us section in each of main,
>contrib, and non-free, since many people would like to use non-US
>software, while still maintaining an entirely free system. And no, saying
>"look at /usr/doc/package/copyright" is not a clear enough answer.

Having non-US inside main would be confusing, because it would
imply that such software is DFSG free, however, I don't think the
DFSG allows software that has export restrictions...

Please correct me though if I am wrong...