Re: [Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>] Re: Debian & BSD concerns
- To: Stephen Carpenter <sjc@delphi.com>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>] Re: Debian & BSD concerns
- From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
- Date: 09 Mar 1999 23:35:01 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87sobdhk62.fsf@wsfs05.mckesson.com>
- In-reply-to: Stephen Carpenter's message of "Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:19:01 -0500"
- References: <87g180u7xp.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <8790ds3fv4.fsf@cush.dyn.ez-ip.net> <87btiommu0.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <19990221023601.B20712@debian.org> <19990222003245.F925@taz.net.au> <19990221232510.C962@debian.org> <19990223111144.D26756@taz.net.au> <19990223014525.E26485@debian.org> <19990225083102.B24112@taz.net.au> <19990224213906.A13916@debian.org> <[🔎] 19990309231901.A654@Hal.carpanet>
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Carpenter <sjc@delphi.com> writes:
Stephen> Which police State do you live in? I thought (it has
Stephen> been a while) that you lived in the US?
If you don't think the US is a police state then you haven't been
paying attention lately. :)
There has been a bill meandering through Congress that supports WIPO.
Either because of this, or due to specific riders on this bill,
reverse engineering *would* become illegal. Much furor has ensued in
the cryptographic communities because it would make cryptoanalysis
illegal by extension; crytanalysis being nothing more than a very
specific form of reverse engineering. :)
Unfortunately, I know neither the title of the bill nor its current
status.
--
Stephen
---
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. - Bruce Schneier
Reply to: