Re: XPM
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 07:01:00PM +0000, Edward Betts wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be less harmful if I made this new version with names
> > changed - because xpm4g 3.4j-0.8 and libxpm4 3.4k-1 don't share any files
> > (I think so, but I'll check). Everything that just needs libXpm.so.4.10
> > works, and everything that just needs libXpm.so.4.11 works.
>
> I like that one, go for it.
I will, later.
> > BTW Adding that versioned provides feature in dpkg must be really hard.
> > I've seen a lot of people complaining about it, but nothing was done.
>
> What kinds problems were you having, when you tried to implement versioned
> provides?
I didn't try :( *knocks himself in the head*
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to:
- References:
- XPM
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: XPM
- From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: XPM
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: XPM
- From: Edward Betts <edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk>