Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Roman Hodek <rnhodek@immd2.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
> > There is no soname difference, the GNU architecture is not different.
>
> Aiee...
> > Note by the way that there is no convincing me otherwise on going
> > forward with glibc 2.1 in potato. You are just going to have to live
> > with it.
> But there are people who need to recompile packages for older
> distributions! So there must be a possibility to switch environments.
This really should be done in a chrooted environment.
Steve
dunham@cse.msu.edu
Reply to: