[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc 2.1 notes

On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 08:47:24AM -0800, Joel Klecker wrote:

> * lintian's "compiled-with-bad-libc" tag trips on anything linked 
> with glibc 2.1, but under glibc 2.1, __register_frame_info is defined 
> in libc and as such is supposed to be undefined in executables.

Hmmm... I've not been following the details of this, but... what are you
using to compile glibc 2.1? gcc or egcs?

Also, the other day, at the local LUG meeting, I was talking with a die hard
Slackware user, and he says X runs faster when compiled with glibc 2.1... is
that true? If so... why?


Reply to: