Re: Release Notes
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999,Chris Lawrence wrote:
> 1. upgrade-ARCH doesn't exist for ARCH in [m68k, alpha], since they
> never had pre-2.0 releases (and alpha didn't have a 2.0 release; I
> guess this means the release notes really don't apply on alpha).
I have advised the CD group that the upgrade-i386 directory
should only appear on the i386 CD.
> 2. Changing all references to (binary|disks|upgrade)-i386 to -ARCH and
> saying for people to use their architecture instead of ARCH where
> they see it would be nice.
Good Idea! I will incorporate this in the next version of the
> I plan to include your release notes along with a m68k-specific README
> on the quasi-official (or maybe completely-official... who decides
> these things?) m68k CD set I'm working on.
There is a CD mailing list - firstname.lastname@example.org. I
suspect a consensus on this list determines the "Official CD". If this
isn't the case. someone on that list should be able to answer that
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <email@example.com>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9