Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.
Santiago Vila writes:
> If package A conflicts with package B, they conflict regardless of
> A also replacing, providing or whatever else B.
Are you saying that if A c/p/r's B and B is Optional that A must go in
Extra even though it is replacing B? That's unreasonable.
I think the rule was intended to apply to simple conflicts, not to special
uses such as c/p/r.
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
email@example.com Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.