Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 11:14:25AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Are you saying that if A c/p/r's B and B is Optional that A must go in
> Extra even though it is replacing B? That's unreasonable.
If it is unreasonable to have A in extra, then B must be in extra.
The point is that one of them must be in extra if they conflict, and
since a conflict is by all practical and theoretical criteria
commutative, it does not matter, which package declares the conflict.
Antti-Juhani
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
EMACS, n.: Emacs May Allow Customised Screwups
(unknown origin)
Reply to: