Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- To: Florian La Roche <florian@suse.de>
- Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>, tytso@mit.edu, quinlan@transmeta.com, ewt@redhat.com, fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu, ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org, lsb-test@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- From: "Scott K. Ellis" <storm@stormcrow.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:44:47 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.SO4.4.05.9901210941100.15078-100000@escher.powersite.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990121092136.A6788@knorke.saar.de>
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Florian La Roche wrote:
> There are reasons why all distributions stayed with /var/spool/mail.
> Even Debian who also thinks a lot about making things sane/clean has
> stayed with /var/spool/mail.
Note that Debian has not yet moved from FSSTND to FHS for the most part,
and relocating /var/spool/mail hasn't been done in part due to discussion
on the technical issues involved.
Reply to: