Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>
- Cc: florian@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, quinlan@transmeta.com, ewt@redhat.com, fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu, ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org, lsb-test@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- From: bandregg@redhat.com
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:29:40 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 199901211429.JAA00922@sideshow.redhat.com>
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:53:32 PST." <[🔎] 199901210753.XAA25754@cesium.transmeta.com>
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:53:32 -0800 (PST), "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>Given that, it is better to use /var/mail, because the mail inbox
>directory is *not* a spool (a daemon transshipment point -- the mail
>*spool* is /var/spool/mqueue.) Putting it under /var/spool causes
>disk space management problems.
But mine is. My mail spools there until I collect it via fetchmail. This is
exactly the process of outgoing mail spooling in /var/spool/mqueue in reverse.
--
Bryan C. Andregg * <bandregg@redhat.com> * Red Hat Software
"Gee, I'm glad you're around to tell me the almighty-truth[tm]."
-- Patrick J. Volkerding
Reply to: