Re: make mutt the `standard' mail reader

[Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>]

Adam Klein <aklein@scn.org> writes:

   On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 04:31:47PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
   > Our Elm is not the standard Elm.  Ours is Elm-ME+, which *does* have active
   > development.  (It is, unlike mutt, a released thing though.)  It sports PGP,
   > MIME, etc. which the "normal" mutt does not.  It also has frequent updates
   > and an active upstream maintainer.

   One little thing.  Our "normal" mutt does have PGP support.

I think he meant ``elm'' instead of ``mutt'' in that instance.