Re: 2.0.36 in slink, so isdnutils should go in as well!
On Wed 06 Jan 1999, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 6 January 1999, at 11 h 29, the keyboard of Paul Slootman
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I've discovered that 2.0.36 has quietly gone into slink (I say quietly,
> > as there was a lot of discussion whether it should go in, and there was
> > no announce "OK, it's going in").
> > Anyway, this means that isdnutils _must_ also be upgraded. I've
> And the bug in 2.0.36 which breaks the ISDN callback? You gave me a driver patch which works but it is probably not on slink's kernel 2.0.36...
I've already submitted a bug against kernel-image-2.0.36 (with patch)
> Yet another case of racing to get the last version instead of testing.
Well, if *everyone* waits until testing is done, that testing will *never*
be done. Remember, you need the last (latest) version before you can test
it. Additionally, most of the ISDN cards sold the last 6 months are only
supported by the ISDN code in 2.0.36; this is not a simple case of wanting
the latest version number, it is a *significant* improvement.
Whether 2.0.36 should be the standard kernel in slink or only available
as an option (like 2.0.33 and 2.0.34 were in hamm (I think)), is another
home: firstname.lastname@example.org | work: email@example.com | debian: firstname.lastname@example.org
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands