Re: i586 debian port?
- To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: i586 debian port?
- From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
- Date: 02 Jan 1999 13:23:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] xnoww35lv6y.fsf@tyr.diku.dk>
- In-reply-to: John Goerzen's message of Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:48:21 -0600
- References: <19981231075942.A2991@spire.ddns.org> <19981231120025.C4678@visi.net> <19981231083237.B2991@spire.ddns.org> <19981231114820.A353@complete.org>
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
> Well, we will be needing an i386 porting team soon anyway. (Actually, we
> needed one months or years ago already.) More and more developers are doing
How big is that problem right now?
By grepping and diffing in the Packages files I found the following
packages in the m68k platform whitout findig the same name in the i386
platform:
Package: amiga-fdisk
Package: atari-bootstrap
Package: atari-fdisk
Package: kernel-image-2.0.33-amiga
Package: kernel-image-2.0.33-atari
Package: ldap-utils
Package: ldapd
Package: libg++2.8-dev
Package: libldap
Package: libldap-dev
Package: libstdc++2.8-dev
Package: lsof
Package: mac-fdisk
Package: newt0.25
Package: newt0.25-dev
Package: nvram
Package: pmac-fdisk-cross
Package: ppmtoagafb
Package: ppmtofb
Package: setsccserial
Package: vmelilo
Package: xserver-fbdev
And the following for the alpha platform:
Package: aboot
Package: libc6.1
Package: libc6.1-dbg
Package: libc6.1-dev
Package: libc6.1-pic
Package: libffm1
Package: libffm1-dev
Package: lsof
Package: newt0.25
Package: newt0.25-dev
Package: xserver-tga
I'm not saying that there is no problem. I'm trying to find out how
big it is. We should probaly soon begin to think of making a list of
the packages needing a port to i386. How is that list made most easy?
I'm not yet developer so I couldn't yet make a i386 port specific page.
--
Peter er den mindst gamle af de gammeldags usenettere, og moderator på
den eneste modererede gruppe i dk.*, so there.
- citat RockBear
Reply to: