Re: Qt license change
On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 08:24:23AM -0600, john@dhh.gt.org wrote:
> Yes. One nit:
>
> Paragraph 3b appears to essentially put patches in the public domain. I
> assume that what they intend is that they be put under the QPL.
Hah. Don't be fooled.
They want to be able to relicense your patches for the commercial Qt. This
isn't such a bad thing to want, and I don't think it conflicts with the
DFSG. (If they didn't require this, commercial Qt would soon fall way
behind the free one -- then Troll Tech has a problem.)
Avery
Reply to: