On Sat, Nov 14, 1998 at 04:36:48AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Martin Schulze wrote: > > I made a quick check of the Packages file from slink and found > > these possible showstoppers: > > I'm guessing you only looked at packages in main? > > > I wonder what we're going to do about them. Wichert, can you monitor > > them? I guess I shall files some bug reports. > > I'll try to keep up.. > > > Package: crypt++el 2.84-3 > > Unmet recommendation: mailcrypt > > I'm guessing mailcrypt is in non-us, so either this package should be moved > to contrib or the recommendation should be downgraded to a Suggest. > > > Package: vrwave 0.9-1 > > Unmet dependency: jdk1.1-runtime|jdk-shared|jdk-static > > This package should be moved to contrib, the jdk stuff is not in main. > > > Package: vrwave 0.9-1 > > Unmet dependency: unzip > > unzip isn't in main, so this should be downgraded to a Suggests or vrwave > should be moved to contrib. > > > Package: mutt 0.94.15-2 > > Unmet recommendation: gnupg > > gnupg is in non-us, I don't think we have a policy on dependencies on packages > in non-us. I suggest downgrading the recommendation to a suggest. I wholeheartedly agree! mutt works FINE without any crypto software at all, though I use the same pgp/keyrings I use for signing uploaded packages. > > Package: yorick-dev 1.4-9 > > Unmet dependency: xdevel > > xdevel? That doesn't exist.. Somebody has an xdevel someplace! heh > > Package: boot-floppies 2.0.11 > > Unmet dependency: slang0.99.38-pic > > iirc a new versino if slang is needed. > > > Package: most 4.7-1.1 > > Unmet dependency: slang0.99.38 > > Same. An upload of the boot-floppies without slang0 should happen soon. Those libs should be in oldlibs don't you think? -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Attachment:
pgpKkLon1yV6Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature